In response to a Nov. 28 press release issued by Yates & Associates [see West Breaking News, Nov. 28], Roger Chaix of R.E. Chaix & Associates reiterated that the out-of-court settlement was mutually agreed upon and that both the Yates complaint and Chaix’s cross-complaint were dismissed.
During a factual hearing in June 2000, the judge completely dismissed the Temporary Restraining Order against Chaix, Hippard, and Ravelo. On Sept. 1, both parties mutually agreed to drop their respective lawsuits.
“We are happy to report that at the June hearing, the judge restated the well-known concept that no MGA ‘owns’ the renewals and the customer (and agent) are not only free to seek the best deal for renewal, but have a duty to do so,” Chaix stated.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Mustard Maker Caught Pumping Pollutants Into River for Years and Lying About It 
Lululemon Slips as Texas Announces Probe of ‘Forever Chemicals’ 
Connecticut High Court: Injured Rental Car Occupants Covered for Uninsured Motorist 
Here’s a List of Gulf Energy Infrastructure Damaged in Iran War 
