九色

Montana Judge Explains Verdict Reversal in Insurance Case

October 8, 2013

A U.S. District Court judge has explained why he vacated the fraud conviction of a former Miss Montana who was charged with misrepresenting her housing conditions to an insurance company while her historic mansion was undergoing repairs.

Christin D. Didier was convicted in April of mail fraud and conspiracy for collecting nearly $123,000 for temporary housing in 2008. Prosecutors say she told insurers she was living in a large house that cost just over $15,000 a month when she was actually living in an 860-square-foot family-owned cabin with no indoor plumbing.

U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy vacated the conviction in July. The Daily Inter Lake reported Molloy’s explanation, filed Friday, said the insurance company owed Didier an amount sufficient to maintain her standard of living whether she used the money for housing or not.

Topics Legislation

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • October 8, 2013 at 3:03 pm
    I'd like to see the form says:
    What happened to Actual Loss Sustained? Let's see the judge explain that!
  • October 8, 2013 at 2:00 pm
    no faith in the law says:
    Amazes me it is who you know and how the laws work if this had been your every day average person this would not of been the case and I am sure her agent was in on it also bu... read more
  • October 8, 2013 at 1:49 pm
    Whodathunkit? says:
    A very cogent, clear, and concise ruling your honor. Huh? What? Is that a legal fact? She should have claimed the life style of the Queen of England, she would have collecte... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (3)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features