By a vote of 228-184 on Thursday, the House of Representatives favorably approved H.R. 420, the Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act (LARA).
The legislation, introduced by Representative Lamar Smith (R-Texas), would penalize attorneys, law firms, or parties who file frivolous lawsuits, and sets limits on 芒鈧揻orum shopping,芒鈧 whereby plaintiffs芒鈧劉 attorneys seek the most plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions in which to file a lawsuit against corporate defendants. Under LARA, a suit could be filed only in the jurisdiction in which the plaintiff lives, where the injury occurred or where the defendant has its principal place of business.
Agents and insurers alike hailed the passage.
芒鈧揟his bill would impose mandatory sanctions against those parties filing frivolous lawsuits,芒鈧 said the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (NAMIC) senior vice president for federal affairs David A. Winston. 芒鈧揙ur member companies have been forced to use their valuable financial and human resources to respond to such lawsuits. These resources would otherwise be available to grow their businesses and employ more American workers.芒鈧
芒鈧揥e are thrilled that the House has passed this bill,芒鈧 said Charles E. Symington Jr., Big 芒鈧揑芒鈧 senior vice president of government affairs and federal relations. 芒鈧揑f ultimately enacted, H.R. 420 will greatly discourage lawyers from filing frivolous lawsuits and prevent them from shopping around for plaintiff-friendly courthouses to bolster their chances of successfully litigating cases of dubious merits. These two developments would be tremendous steps forward for the small business community.芒鈧
芒鈧揊rivolous lawsuits cost Americans billions of dollars each year,芒鈧 said Property Casualty Insurers Association of America President and CEO Ernie Csiszar. 芒鈧揥hile many cases are legitimate, many others are filed by lawyers simply trying to make a buck at the expense of higher costs of goods and services, including insurance, for consumers. This legislation will increase penalties for lawyers who abuse the system for their own monetary advantage and put the savings back into the pockets of American consumers.芒鈧
The Association of Trial Lawyers of America called the bill 芒鈧搖nnecessary.芒鈧
芒鈧揟he bill is unnecessary – all 50 states already have laws that allow judges to throw out a frivolous suit and sanction the attorney who filed it – but Congress has shown once again it places a higher priority on protecting negligent corporations than the rights of ordinary Americans to seek justice,芒鈧 said Ken Suggs, president of the Association of Trial Lawyers of America (ATLA).
ATLA also contends that the legislation prevents some foreign corporations from being held accountable in U.S. courts because the bill would require the lawsuit to be brought out where the defendant芒鈧劉s principal place of business is located, even if that is overseas.
芒鈧揑n other words, the injured American family would have to travel abroad to file a lawsuit,芒鈧 ATLA said in a statement.
The tort reform bill was passed last year by the House but stalled in the Senate.
芒鈧揚CI urges the Senate to move quickly on this sensible legislation to bring needed relief to courts, businesses and consumers across the nation,芒鈧 Csiszar said.
Topics Lawsuits Legislation Politics
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Viewpoint: Why Brokers Have Little to Fear and Everything to Gain From AI
Mustard Maker Caught Pumping Pollutants Into River for Years and Lying About It
Toilet Paper Warehouse Fire Investigators Review Viral Video
Hedge Fund Money Is Reshaping a 180-Year-Old Insurance Model 

