Garamendi v. Superior National Insurance
(California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Oct. 26, 2005)(Unpublished)
Ruling: At issue was the trial court decision denying the insureds’ proof of claim for paid time-off benefits as a first priority claim under Insurance Code 茂驴陆1033(a)(1). The court held that a proof of paid time-off benefits is properly disallowed, where the claimant remanded the employee of the insurance holding company after being terminated by the Commissioner of Insurance.
Information compiled by Goldberg Segalla. Web site:
www.goldbergsegalla.com.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
IBM Agrees to Pay Government $17 Million in DEI Settlement 
Lululemon Slips as Texas Announces Probe of ‘Forever Chemicals’ 
Here’s a List of Gulf Energy Infrastructure Damaged in Iran War 
US E&S Growth Slows Again; Declining Berkshire Volume Tops Leaders From This Issue
